Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 749/2021

Case between Sijo Joy vs Nassar regarding Dismissal of the suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-06-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sijo Joy, was absent during the hearing, and the case was represented only by the defendant, Nassar. The court dismissed the case due to lack of representation from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff did not appear, leading to a lack of representation for the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide any representation.

Judgment Evidence:

I.A 6/24 and 7/24 dismissed. Case in list. No representation. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sijo Joy (37 years) Valiya Veetil House, House No. G-98, Panampilly Nagar P.O, Kochi – 682 036 V.V Joy (70 years) 23 Cromwell Road, Country Antrim, Belfast, BT 71JW, United Kingdom

Defendants

Nassar (53 years) Kalapurakkal House, Vennala P.O, Edappally South Village, Ernakulam – 682 028

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases