Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1181/2022

Case between Signature Holidays vs Sunil @ Raja et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Signature Holidays filed a suit against Sunil @ Raja and Athar Raza @ Sujith. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs not taking fresh steps against the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs did not take necessary steps against the defendants despite several chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to take necessary steps as required by the court.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default under Order 9 Rule 5 Civil Code of Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Signature Holidays (Age not specified years) V 17, Raman Arcade, First floor, Ninth croos road, Panampally nagar, Ernakualm – 682 036

Defendants

Sunil @ Raja (40 years) VACATIONADDA, Shahni Tower, A 113, near Rajendranagar Metro Station, Ghaziabad, Delhi (NCR) – 2011 005 Athar Raza @ Sujith (32 years) VACATIONADDA, Shahni Tower, A 113, near Rajendranagar Metro Station, Ghaziabad, Delhi (NCR) – 2011 005

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default under Order 9 Rule 5 Civil Code of Procedure
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default under Order 9 Rule 5 Civil Code of Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases