Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1700/2025

Case between Shylaja vs Sanal regarding petition for IA.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-15
Duration
Case Code No.
1700
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Shylaja and her daughter Soorya, are involved in a case against the defendants, including Sanal and others. The court has allowed the petition for further inquiry on the disputes.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for further inquiry, appointing an advocate commissioner to ascertain the disputes.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for further inquiry, appointing an advocate commissioner to ascertain the disputes.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners made a prima facie case for further inquiry.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners made a prima facie case for further inquiry.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners has made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the petition and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shylaja
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soorya. S
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanal
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mani
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. J.K. Ajith Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Advocate Beena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The IA is allowed to ascertain the matters in the petition and elucidate the disputes.
Evidence:
Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the petition and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of advocate commissioner to visit the property and report.
Evidence:
Advocate Beena is appointed as the advocate commissioner. She is directed to visit the plaint schedule property within 2 days.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit along with the plaint and other documents.
Reference:
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs and considered the overall arguments.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won