Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1078/2024

Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shyju Antony filed a suit against the Apostolic Administrator and others. The plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's continuous absence resulted in dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's continuous absence resulted in dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was specifically for the plaintiff to appear and submit whether the plaintiff is proceeding with the suit. Still the plaintiff is absent and not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shyju Antony
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Apostolic Administrator
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rev.Fr.Joshy Puthuva
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rev. Fr. Simon Pallupetta
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayabal Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arathy P.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prinsun Philip
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dalbi Emmanuel
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.Ananthanarayanan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Josmy P Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jose Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shiju Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Remya Gilbert
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won