Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 607/2012

Case between Shwas Homes Pvt. Ltd. vs Pranish Bhaskaran regarding lifting of interim attachment

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shwas Homes Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit for the realization of money against Pranish Bhaskaran. The court is considering a petition to lift the interim attachment on a property owned by Pranish.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to lift the interim attachment on the property owned by Pranish Bhaskaran, stating that the previous order of attachment no longer exists due to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The previous attachment order was lifted as the suit had been dismissed for default and the petitioner demonstrated merits in the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the above petition is allowed on the following terms: Property attached as per order in IA 4400/2012 dated 21.07.2012 is released from attachment.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Shwas Homes Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) Ground Floor, Mystic Heights Phase I, Kaniyampuzha Road, Ernakulam

Defendants

Pranish Bhaskaran (50 years years) Apartment No. 17 A1-Mystic-Heights, Phase I, Kaniyampuzha Road, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Lifting of the interim attachment of the property.
Evidence:
Satisfied that petition has merits. Hence petition is allowed in the interest of justice.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Interim Attachment Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The court lifted the interim attachment order related to the property in question.
Reference:
IA 4400/2012

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases