O.S No. 601/2023

Case between Shri.Rixon Sebastian vs Smt.Preetha Chandran regarding rejection of suit

Court

I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Padmakumar.G.

Order Date

2024-03-04

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shri.Rixon Sebastian filed a suit against Smt.Preetha Chandran. The case was heard, and the court rejected the plaintiff's application due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to absence and non-payment of court fees.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's application was rejected due to absence and failure to pay court fees.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's application was rejected due to absence and failure to pay court fees.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff absent, represented. BCF not paid. Plaint Rejected.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 04th day of March, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shri.Rixon Sebastian
Party Age: 39
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Smt.Preetha Chandran
Party Age: 41
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Rajesh Vijayendran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Asok Chacko Thomas
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sidhiqul Akbar K.A
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: C.H.Abdul Rasac
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P.P.Niyas
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected.

Evidence:

Plaint Rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification