Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No. 13/2025

Case between Showkath C. K. vs Latheef P. K. regarding dishonor of cheques

Court
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan B.
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant, Showkath C. K., filed a complaint against the accused, Latheef P. K., for dishonor of cheques issued in favor of the complainant for a loan. The court found the accused guilty of committing the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused was found guilty and sentenced to Simple Imprisonment and a fine of ₹20,00,000 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Accused sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment and pay a fine of ₹20,00,000
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found guilty and sentenced to Simple Imprisonment and a fine of ₹20,00,000 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant provided sufficient evidence that the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, which were dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant provided sufficient evidence that the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, which were dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has categorically established that there existed a money transaction between himself and the accused. All the statutory formalities with respect to the institution of the complaint have been followed in this case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Only) U/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Showkath C. K.
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latheef P. K.
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No.695541 for Rs.5,00,000/-, Cheque No.695542 for Rs.5,00,000/-, Cheque No.695543 for Rs.5,00,000/-
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimesh K. P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ratheesh Kumar K. K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation for the dishonored cheques.
Evidence:
In the result, the accused is sentenced to... Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Only) U/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court.
Evidence:
the accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Further imprisonment in default of payment of fine.
Evidence:
In default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented for payment and returned for insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented for payment and returned for insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented for payment and returned for insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Memo showing Funds Insufficient
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving that cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Memo showing Funds Insufficient
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving that cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Memo showing Funds Insufficient
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving that cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the accused for failure to pay cheque amount.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof that the accused received the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.P9

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Showkath C. K. vs Latheef P. K. regarding dishonor of cheques
Case Code Year
Case between Showkath C. K. vs Latheef P. K. regarding dishonor of cheques

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
6 months

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 02/24/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Faisal vs Rahees regarding dishonor of cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Moosa S/o Aboobacker Haji vs Sajeevan S/o Kumaran regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between P. Muhammadali vs Ameer Kattaroli regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil vs Shamsu regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M. K. Abdul Rahman vs Hameed P. K. regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won