Case Summary
Complainant Shoukkathali accused Jenson of dishonouring a cheque issued towards him, leading to a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Criminal Case - Negotiable Instruments Act
Final Judgment
No
The complaint is returned to the complainant to file in the proper court within 30 days following a Supreme Court ruling on territorial jurisdiction.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shoukkathali
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o. Moidheenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jenson
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o. Balakrishnan
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Decided
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Complaint to be returned for filing in the proper court within 30 days following Supreme Court ruling on territorial jurisdiction.
Evidence:
Within 30 days in consonance with exposition of law by the Honourable Supreme Court.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Negotiable Instruments Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Dishonour of cheque
Case Code
Case between Shoukkathali vs Jenson regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Shoukkathali vs Jenson regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case