Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1106/2018

Case between Shoby Joy vs Thankan C.O regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Shoby Joy and defendant Thankan C.O are involved in a civil suit regarding a dismissal for default. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of bona-fides.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of bona-fides.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff showed no bona-fides to conduct the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff showed no bona-fides to conduct the case.
Supporting Evidence
The Proof Affidavit filed and the petitions were contradictory which shows lack of bona-fides.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shoby Joy
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankan C.O
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Chandrasekharan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.K.Sajikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Girish R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to lack of bona-fides from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Flight Ticket
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered the flight ticket as evidence related to the Power of Attorney holder's journey.
Reference:
IA 4/25
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The court mentioned the absence of the plaintiff and the presentation of proof affidavit and petitions.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shoby Joy vs Thankan C.O regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Shoby Joy vs Thankan C.O regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won