Case Summary
Shiyad V. K is the plaintiff, and Jestin Xavier and Beena Jestin are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's lack of representation in court despite multiple chances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and represent the case despite multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present themselves in court.
The plaintiff failed to present themselves in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to present themselves in court.
The plaintiff failed to present themselves in court.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Not present or ready for exparte evidence despite multiple chances and posting as last chance no further time.
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shiyad V. K
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jestin Xavier
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena Jestin
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nidhin Raj Vettikkadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjo Francis
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Not present or ready for exparte evidence despite multiple chances and posting as last chance no further time. Dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shiyad V. K vs Jestin Xavier et al regarding dismissal for non-representation.
Case Code Year
Case between Shiyad V. K vs Jestin Xavier et al regarding dismissal for non-representation.