Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 367/2024

Case between Shiny Benson vs M/s Nam Index Derivatives LLP, Sunish Nambiar regarding non payment of balance court fee.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shiny Benson filed the suit against M/s Nam Index Derivatives LLP and Sunish Nambiar. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's continuous non-representation and failure to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint for non-payment of balance court fee as the plaintiff was continuously not represented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint for non-payment of balance court fee as the plaintiff was continuously not represented.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shiny Benson
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Nam Index Derivatives LLP
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunish Nambiar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sunil N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjana Devi G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arsha John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arul Muralidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashwin Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreekumar K.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shiny Benson vs M/s Nam Index Derivatives LLP, Sunish Nambiar regarding non payment of balance court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Shiny Benson vs M/s Nam Index Derivatives LLP, Sunish Nambiar regarding non payment of balance court fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won