Case Summary
Shiju Mathew, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Vijayan, the defendant. The plaintiff was absent and did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to dismissal.
Plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to dismissal.
Plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
It is recorded. Hence, suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shiju Mathew
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dhanesh Kumar K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Stejo K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Harisanth A.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sanitha P.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. Its is not pressed by the plaintiff which is endorsed on the plaint.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shiju Mathew vs Vijayan regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Shiju Mathew vs Vijayan regarding dismissal of suit