Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 296 OF 2017

Case between Shihabudheen vs Subrahmanian regarding realization of money

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-01-20
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Sat, 01/20/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant seeking to recover an advance amount paid towards purchasing a property, as the defendant failed to fulfill the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff directing the defendant to pay the advance amount with interest and the cost of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of advance amount with interest at 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff directing the defendant to pay the advance amount with interest and the cost of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided evidence confirming the agreement and the advance payment, and the defendant failed to fulfill the terms.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided evidence confirming the agreement and the advance payment, and the defendant failed to fulfill the terms.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was examined as PW1. He filed an affidavit reiterating the averments in the plaint. Since the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by PW1 remained unchallenged. The plaintiffs have proved their case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 4,44,635/- (Rupees four lakh forty four thousand six hundred and thirty five only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation. 2. The plaintiff is entitled to realize the cost of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shihabudheen
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o. Moideenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subrahmanian
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o. Kumaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Agreement dated 21-07-2014 (Ext.A1)
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.P. Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Irshad.K.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Payment of advance amount with interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of advance amount with interest at 6% per annum
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 4,44,635/- (Rupees four lakh forty four thousand six hundred and thirty five only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Cost of the suit
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the cost of the suit from the defendant
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 2. The plaintiff is entitled to realize the cost of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the agreement detailing the advance payment and terms.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Breach of agreement
Case Code
Case between Shihabudheen vs Subrahmanian regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Shihabudheen vs Subrahmanian regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 01/17/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/20/2018 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Musthafa regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Mohan et al regarding loan closure
Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary, Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Mullakkoyamakkanakath Najmudheen et al regarding debt recovery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won