Case Summary
This case involves Shield pro safety Products, who has filed a suit against M/s C D N Engineering Private Limited for the recovery of Rs. 4,58,845/- which includes principal amount and interest. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has not cleared its dues for goods purchased on credit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay the plaintiff Rs. 4,58,845/- along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs. 4,58,845/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree. Costs of litigation were also awarded to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence including invoices and legal notices to substantiate their claim.
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence including invoices and legal notices to substantiate their claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence including invoices and legal notices to substantiate their claim.
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence including invoices and legal notices to substantiate their claim.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, for such invoices which are system generated in the portal, and for which certification under S.63 of the BSA was also subsequently produced by the plaintiff, there is no reason to doubt its veracity.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows, 1. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹4,58,845/-...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shield pro safety Products
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s C D N Engineering Private Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoices DHS-087, DHS-088, DHS-133, DHS-160, DHS-161, demand notice, lawyer's notice
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.K.Subramanian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Easwar Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abraham Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Subram N.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.S.Balasubramaniam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Laiju Nissa M.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs. 4,58,845/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is found to be entitled to realise 2,92,842/- from the defendant.
Relief Type:
Interest
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 18% per annum is awarded on the decree amount.
Evidence:
With regard to the pre-suit interest claimed, I’m of the opinion that the rate of interest claimed can be granted.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
Hence, the issue as to costs is also found in favour of the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Tax Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These invoices represent the transactions for goods sold by the plaintiff to the defendant on credit.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A5
Document Type:
Demand Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice required the defendant to clear the long-pending dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demanded payment of the outstanding amount together with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
E-way bill
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document pertains to the transaction represented by Invoice DHS-087.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
GST Document
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents are printouts from the GST portal pertaining to the invoices in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A9 to A12
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document grants authority to PW1 to represent the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type:
Board Resolution
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorizes PW1 to conduct legal proceedings on behalf of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type:
Original Reply
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document is the defendant's reply to the legal demand notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Shield pro safety Products et al vs M/s C D N Engineering Private Limited regarding money recovery
Case Code Year
Case between Shield pro safety Products et al vs M/s C D N Engineering Private Limited regarding money recovery