Case Summary
Sheena Bhaskaran, the plaintiff, filed an execution petition against Asha Chandran and others, the defendants. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition as not pressed by the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder did not press the memo, leading to the dismissal.
The decree holder did not press the memo, leading to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder did not press the memo, leading to the dismissal.
The decree holder did not press the memo, leading to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder represented. Not press memo filed. Not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sheena Bhaskaran
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asha Chandran
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini Sajeevan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gheeba Shaji
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Preeba Sunil
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T K Devarajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Not pressing the memo.
Evidence:
Not press memo filed. Not pressed. Dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheena Bhaskaran vs Asha Chandran et al regarding E.P. No. 247/2022
Case Code Year
Case between Sheena Bhaskaran vs Asha Chandran et al regarding E.P. No. 247/2022