Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1749/2017

Case between Sheela vs Soudha et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, I THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-04-02
Duration
approximately-7 years 11 months
Case Closed
Wed, 04/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sheela is the plaintiff, and Soudha, Raju, Prakash, and Nelson are the defendants. The case has been dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheela
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soudha
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju
Party Age
66
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prakash
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nelson
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G Udayabhanu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Akhil Babu J M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sandra Sunil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sanoj R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Sofia T A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Case stands posted for evidence. Hence the suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheela vs Soudha et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sheela vs Soudha et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 04/02/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 04/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won