Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 918/2023

Case between Sheeba Nissar @ Seeba Nissar vs Sajeev Mathew regarding a civil suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sheeba Nissar @ Seeba Nissar is the plaintiff, and Sajeev Mathew is the defendant in this civil suit. The case has been dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to take necessary steps. The defendant was present at the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to take necessary steps. The defendant was present at the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheeba Nissar @ Seeba Nissar
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeev Mathew
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Philip C.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lal K Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sonia Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanjay Sellen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Snita Rose Benjamin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aditya S Puthezhath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Darsana
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Defendant represented. Plaintiff absent no representation despite specific direction to appear. Steps not taken as ordered. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheeba Nissar @ Seeba Nissar vs Sajeev Mathew regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sheeba Nissar @ Seeba Nissar vs Sajeev Mathew regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won