Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.337 /2021

Case between Sheeba Joseph @ Sheeba Joe vs The Municipal Corporation of Kochi regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Sheeba Joseph who is seeking an injunction against the Municipal Corporation of Kochi to restrain them from obstructing access to her property. She claims that the defendant's construction activities are blocking her right of way and depriving her of light and air.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff regarding the deprivation of access to her property. The defendant was restrained from obstructing the access to the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is restrained from doing any act to deprive the access from B schedule road to A schedule property or to cause obstructions against user of B schedule pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully established the cause of action regarding the illegal construction activities depriving her access.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed partly. Defendant is restrained from doing any act to deprive the access from B schedule road to A schedule property or to cause obstructions against user of B schedule pathway.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sheeba Joseph @ Sheeba Joe (48 years years) Confident Capeella, Apartment No. 1014, Stair 4, Nilampathinjamughal Road, Trikkakara Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kakkanad P O, Ernakulam- 682030

Defendants

The Municipal Corporation of Kochi (Age not specified years) Corporation Office, Shanmugham Road, Ernakulam- 682011, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant from obstructing access to the B schedule road.
Evidence:
Defendant is restrained from doing any act to deprive the access from B schedule road to A schedule property or to cause obstructions against user of B schedule pathway.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought an order to remove the obstruction caused by the defendant's shed.
Evidence:
The issue No. 3 is found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership and possession of the A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim regarding the title of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of occupancy and maintenance of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Location Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides verification of the property location related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the tax compliance concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual evidence related to the condition and access to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual evidence related to the condition and access to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(a)
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual evidence related to the condition and access to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6(b)
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided factual findings regarding the obstruction claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Supporting visual evidence related to the findings of the court.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a1) to C1(a5)
Document Type: Compact Disc
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Contains recorded materials relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Oral evidence
Relevance:
Testimonies provided by the plaintiff's witnesses.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 03/24/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Municipal Corporation

Similar Cases