OS. No.1987/2014

Case between Sheeba Devan vs Reji Mathew et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Court

THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III

Judge

Smt.Sreelakshmi. C

Order Date

2025-03-26

Duration

Case Closed

Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sheeba Devan is the plaintiff in this case against Reji Mathew and Tity Shah Reji Mathew. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not make any representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff without representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear or make any representation in the court.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear or make any representation in the court.

Supporting Evidence

It is seen from proceedings that Plaintiff is continuously absent and no representation is made.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Hence Dismissed Pronounced in open court on this the day of 26th March 2025

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sheeba Devan
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Reji Mathew
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Tity Shah Reji mathew
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Praveen Vyasan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. A. Santhosh kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. .R.Ramesh
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.

Evidence:

Hence I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Hence Dismissed

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification