Case Summary
The complainant, Shanavas, alleged that the accused, Sunil Lal, issued a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The case was dismissed due to the complainant's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed, and the accused was found not guilty and acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant did not appear and failed to prosecute the case.
The complainant did not appear and failed to prosecute the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Since the complainant is absent when the case was called and no reason for his absence was given before this court, it is only to be presumed that the complainant is absent because of his lack of interest in his case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shanavas
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil Lal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A.Abdul Khalam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Francis Jude Netto
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complaint dismissed under section 256(1) of Cr.P.C. and the accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2021
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act