Case Summary
The plaintiff filed a suit seeking partition of a property acquired by the father of the defendants where they are in joint possession. The defendants failed to appear, and the plaintiff provided evidence leading to a decree for partition in her favor.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit for partition, granting the plaintiff a preliminary decree to divide the property into 56 shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, I hold a view that the plaintiff has proved her case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence and she is entitled for a decree as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get 7 share out of the 56 shares in the plaint B schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shamsath Beegam
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o. Aboobacker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anwar Sadath
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhalavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shabeer Babu
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o. Kuhhalavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayishabee
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o. Peringattu thodi Kunhalavi, W/o. Kallumurikkal Kunheethu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rasiya
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o. Peringattu thodi Kunhalavi, W/o. Ayapalliyalil Kunhahammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathummu
- Relation
- W/o. Kunhalavi
Plaintiffs Documents
Kanam Assignment deed No. 994/1972
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Jamshid Rahman. C.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Najumudheen.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Rahiyanath.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree for partition of the B schedule property into 56 equal shares.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get 7 share out of the 56 shares in the plaint B schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting plaintiff's claim regarding B schedule property acquisition.
Reference:
No. 994/1972
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shamsath Beegam vs Anwar Sadath et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Shamsath Beegam vs Anwar Sadath et al regarding partition