Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.818/2021

Case between Shameer.S vs Shanavas et al regarding dismissal for failure to present evidence.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-04-05
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months
Case Code No.
818
Case Closed
Sat, 04/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shameer.S filed a suit against Shanavas and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff did not provide any evidence during the hearings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff did not provide any evidence during the hearings.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that no evidence was presented by the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that no evidence was presented by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
It is seen that it can only considered as delay tactics.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as no evidence adduced by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shameer.S
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shanavas
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jasmine
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Kalam
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S.Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.A.G.Gireesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Aneesha Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Veena.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Abhijith.S.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed as no evidence was adduced by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
But it is seen that it can only considered as delay tatics. Hence suit is dismissed as no evidence adduced by the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 04/05/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 04/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won