Case Summary
Shamal T.S @ Pareed brought a suit against Jamal T.S. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the defendant was represented. The court dismissed the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit since the plaintiff was absent and no proof affidavit was filed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence and failure to file a proof affidavit led to the dismissal.
Plaintiff's absence and failure to file a proof affidavit led to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence and failure to file a proof affidavit led to the dismissal.
Plaintiff's absence and failure to file a proof affidavit led to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. No proof affidavit filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 15th day of March, 2024.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shamal T.S @ Pareed
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jamal T.S
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vivek Mathew Varkey
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sunil Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kabil Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shamal T.S @ Pareed vs Jamal T.S regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Shamal T.S @ Pareed vs Jamal T.S regarding suit dismissal for default.