Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 962/2025

Case between Shaji M.V vs Arunima regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shaji M.V alleges that the defendant, Arunima, harassed him and his family after the marriage of his son to her. The case seeks a permanent injunction to prevent further harassment and to protect the plaintiff's family.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, preventing her from entering the plaintiff's property and disturbing their peaceful enjoyment of it.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and established the likelihood of harassment by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: a) The defendant is restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from entering into the plaint schedule property and from making any kind of act in order to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Shaji M.V (62 years years) Madathichirayil House, Kundannoor, Maradu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin: 682 304

Defendants

Arunima (33 years years) Valliyankal House, Piravom.P.O, Piravom Village, Muvattupuzha Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin: 686 664

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from entering into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from entering into the plaint schedule property and from making any kind of act in order to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.
Evidence:
The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified true copy of Sale Deed bearing No. 3219/1/2002 was marked as subject proof.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt issued by Maradu Village was submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Complaint filed before the SHO, Maradu Police Station was provided as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt of Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Receipt of acknowledgment was presented in court.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases