Case Summary
Shaji M.V alleges that the defendant, Arunima, harassed him and his family after the marriage of his son to her. The case seeks a permanent injunction to prevent further harassment and to protect the plaintiff's family.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, preventing her from entering the plaintiff's property and disturbing their peaceful enjoyment of it.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and established the likelihood of harassment by the defendant.
The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and established the likelihood of harassment by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and established the likelihood of harassment by the defendant.
The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and established the likelihood of harassment by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 remains unchallenged. The case of the plaintiff stands proved through PW1. A possibility of the defendant causing problems to the plaintiff is established through the evidence of PW1.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: a) The defendant is restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from entering into the plaint schedule property and from making any kind of act in order to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shaji M.V
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arunima
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified true copy of Sale Deed bearing No. 3219/1/2002, Land Tax Receipt issued by Maradu Village, Copy of Complaint filed before the SHO, Maradu Police Station, Copy of Receipt of acknowledgment
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T. P Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from entering into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from entering into the plaint schedule property and from making any kind of act in order to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.
Evidence:
The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified true copy of Sale Deed bearing No. 3219/1/2002 was marked as subject proof.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt issued by Maradu Village was submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Copy of complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Complaint filed before the SHO, Maradu Police Station was provided as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Receipt of Acknowledgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Receipt of acknowledgment was presented in court.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shaji M.V vs Arunima regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shaji M.V vs Arunima regarding permanent prohibitory injunction