Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1175/2025

Case between Shajahan.A. vs Smitha Sundaresan regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shajahan.A. is seeking an ad-interim injunction against Smitha Sundaresan to prevent her from trespassing into a specific property and committing any waste. The court finds that the plaintiff has presented a prima facie case for granting this injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, restraining her from trespassing into the plaint schedule property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, restraining her from trespassing into the plaint schedule property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an–ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from committing any waste in the same until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shajahan.A.
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smitha Sundaresan
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, plaint and other documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.S Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
an–ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from committing any waste in the same until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Used to establish a prima facie case for the injunction.
Reference:
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Document that supports the petitioner's claim.
Reference:
Document Type: Other Documents
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Refers to additional documents relevant to the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shajahan.A. vs Smitha Sundaresan regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shajahan.A. vs Smitha Sundaresan regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Smitha @ Salini vs Soumya. L regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won