Case Summary
Shaila V filed a suit against Joy Das and others. The court found that the plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed and dismissed it accordingly.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit after the plaintiff's counsel indicated it was not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff decided not to pursue it.
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff decided not to pursue it.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff decided not to pursue it.
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff decided not to pursue it.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for the plaintiff endorsed on the plaint that suit is not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shaila V
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joy Das
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunilal
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratheesh
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.S. Rajeev Chempakassery
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Arun S.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for the plaintiff endorsed on the plaint that suit is not pressed. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shaila V vs Joy Das et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Shaila V vs Joy Das et al regarding dismissal of suit