Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 143 OF 2015

Case between Shahul Hameed Kottayil vs Ahammed Kutty Kottayil et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-08-08
Duration
2 years 0 months 14 days
Case Closed
Tue, 08/08/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shahul Hameed Kottayil filed an original suit against multiple defendants for partition.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court ordered the parties to appear on a specified date for a suit for partition.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the parties to appear on a specified date for a suit for partition.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for partition. IA. 1828/2017 filed under Order 7 Rule 10A. Hence parties shall appear before the court on 22-09-2017

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahul Hameed Kottayil
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o. Kunhipokkar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ahammed Kutty Kottayil
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o. Kunhipokker
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayishu
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o. Ambayappulli Saithalikkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hussain Kottayil
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o. Kunhipokkar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yahutty Kottayil
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o. Kunhipokkar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rubeena
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o. Badarul Muneer Kavungil
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rehmathunneesa
Party Age
26
Relation
W/o. Faisal Babu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kathiyamu
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o. Kunhipokkar Kottayil
Plaintiffs Documents
IA. 1828/2017 filed under Order 7 Rule 10A
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Majeed Kalappattil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shahul Hameed Kottayil vs Ahammed Kutty Kottayil et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Shahul Hameed Kottayil vs Ahammed Kutty Kottayil et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 08/08/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/08/2017 - 12:00
From
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Thottupurath Kormman's Son Chatha et al vs Koran et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won