Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 504/2018

Case between Shahjahan T.A. vs The Cochin Shipyard Employees Organization et al regarding rejection of plaint

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-17
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 01/17/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shahjahan T.A. filed a suit against The Cochin Shipyard Employees Organization and others. The case was heard but the plaintiff was absent and had no representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation by counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation by counsel.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit balance court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit balance court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. No balance court fees is seen remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahjahan T.A.
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Cochin Shipyard Employees Organization
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R. Chandrasekharan
Relation
President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M. Liju
Relation
General Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
John Varghese K.
Relation
Vice-President (Non-Technical)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Ambikashan
Relation
Convener
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anand N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dhanya Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Siyad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and counsel.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shahjahan T.A. vs The Cochin Shipyard Employees Organization et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between Shahjahan T.A. vs The Cochin Shipyard Employees Organization et al regarding rejection of plaint

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/17/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Cochin Shipyard Employees Organization

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won