Case Summary
Seyyad Ali is the plaintiff and P.A. Sugathan is the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Seyyad Ali
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.A. Sugathan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Poonthura Tharif. B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020