Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 207/2023

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Ciney Elizabeth Abraham et al regarding rejection of plaint.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the Self Employers Service Society as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Ciney Elizabeth Abraham and Sunil K John. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-remittance of balance court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not remitted so far.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Service Society
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ciney Elizabeth Abraham
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil K John
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanilkumar P
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Remya Sanilkumar
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Benny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. James Mathen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Deepak G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's plaint was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted so far. Hence plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Ciney Elizabeth Abraham et al regarding rejection of plaint.
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Ciney Elizabeth Abraham et al regarding rejection of plaint.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Elizabeth Mani et al vs M/s. Coromandel International Ltd., EID – Parry (India) Ltd. regarding property possession
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self-Employers Service Society vs Bindhu Sanil et al regarding Suit dismissal
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Rajesh V. regarding dismissal of suit
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumari Anuranjana Anil vs Deputy Director of Education et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won