Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 423/2021

Case between Self Employers Service Society et al vs Vinodkumar P.N et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Self Employers Service Society is the plaintiff represented by Mr M V Josekutty. The defendants include Vinodkumar P.N, Roopa A Rao, Biju John, and Padmavathy R. The case was about the dismissal of the suit due to lack of interest from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not represented and showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not represented and showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not show interest in continuing the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not show interest in continuing the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and did not show interest in continuing the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence it has to be presumed that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the case. Suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Service Society
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinodkumar P.N
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roopa A Rao
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju John
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmavathy R
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
James Mathen K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rayin K R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed due to presumed lack of interest from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence it has to be presumed that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Service Society et al vs Vinodkumar P.N et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Service Society et al vs Vinodkumar P.N et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Elizabeth Mani et al vs M/s. Coromandel International Ltd., EID – Parry (India) Ltd. regarding property possession
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self-Employers Service Society vs Bindhu Sanil et al regarding Suit dismissal
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Rajesh V. regarding dismissal of suit
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumari Anuranjana Anil vs Deputy Director of Education et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won