Case Summary
This case involves Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd suing Mr. Muhammed Raffi and others. The court ultimately rejected the plaint due to absence of representation and lack of proper documentation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected by the court due to absence of representation and lack of proper court fees or fresh vakalath.
Key Reasoning:
Absence of representation and failure to file fresh vakalath led to rejection.
Absence of representation and failure to file fresh vakalath led to rejection.
Why Defendant Won:
Absence of representation and failure to file fresh vakalath led to rejection.
Absence of representation and failure to file fresh vakalath led to rejection.
Supporting Evidence
No representation. No fresh vakalath filed or Balance Court Fee remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Muhammed Raffi
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Shajahan K.S
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Reghunatha Pillai
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammad Sha. S
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Benny Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected due to no representation and no fresh vakalath filed.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025