O.S. No. 536/2022

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. Kottayam branch vs Arun G et al regarding dismissal by non prosecution.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM

Judge

Smt. Indu. P. Raj

Order Date

2025-10-06

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. filed a suit against multiple defendants including Arun G and others. The court dismissed the case due to non prosecution as the plaintiff did not appear or have representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation. The suit was not prosecuted.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and prosecute the case.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and prosecute the case.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff absent. Case was not represented by concerned counsel.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is also dismissed by non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. Kottayam branch
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Arun G
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rahul Krishnan
Party Age: 29
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anuraj G
Party Age: 33
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rashakrishnan Nair
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Somaraj S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: George V Thomas
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed by non prosecution due to absence of plaintiff and no representation.

Evidence: