Case Summary
The case involves a plaintiff, Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited, represented by Mr. M V Josekutty, who is seeking to resolve a matter against defendants Sundaran V S, Jayalakshmi, and Sunith Soman. The court rejected the plaint due to the non-payment of balance court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ultimately ruled to reject the plaint due to the absence of balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected for lack of payment of balance court fees.
The plaint was rejected for lack of payment of balance court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected for lack of payment of balance court fees.
The plaint was rejected for lack of payment of balance court fees.
Supporting Evidence
No Balance Court Fee paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sundaran V S
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayalakshmi
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunith Soman
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Benny Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to unpaid court fee.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee paid. Hence plaint is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Sundaran V S et al regarding plaint rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Sundaran V S et al regarding plaint rejection.