Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 607/2024

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Mr. Arun. P. Korah et al regarding rejection of suit.

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited represented by Mr.M.V Josekutty filed the suit against Mr. Arun. P. Korah and others. The plaintiff was absent, and the suit was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and failed to remit the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and failed to remit the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not represented. Plaintiff called absent. Balance Court Fee not remitted Suit is rejected.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited Kottayam Branch
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Arun. P. Korah
Party Age
33
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Kora Abraham
Party Age
46
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.P.S. Korah
Party Age
62
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Saji Chacko
Party Age
54
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Benny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. James Mathen.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted Suit is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Mr. Arun. P. Korah et al regarding rejection of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Mr. Arun. P. Korah et al regarding rejection of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Elizabeth Mani et al vs M/s. Coromandel International Ltd., EID – Parry (India) Ltd. regarding property possession
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self-Employers Service Society vs Bindhu Sanil et al regarding Suit dismissal
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Rajesh V. regarding dismissal of suit
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumari Anuranjana Anil vs Deputy Director of Education et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won