Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Seleena, Sobhana, and Bindhu, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Shafi and Francis. The court found the plaintiffs absent at the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce any evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not adduce any evidence.
Plaintiff was absent and did not adduce any evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not adduce any evidence.
Plaintiff was absent and did not adduce any evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff was absent and did not adduce any evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Seleena
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sobhana
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bindhu
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shafi
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Francis
- Party Age
- 48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anojith.B.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Injunction.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Seleena et al vs Shafi et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Seleena et al vs Shafi et al regarding Injunction