Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 991/2022

Case between A. Seetharaman vs A. K Abdul Karim et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff A. Seetharaman, who is 84 years old, failed to appear in court despite specific directions to do so. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of proper representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and was not properly represented.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff is absent despite specific direction to appear without any valid reason and is not properly represented. Suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

A. Seetharaman (84 years) Ram Nivas, K.K Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam 682 018

Defendants

A. K Abdul Karim (55 years) Annakkat House, Bank Road, Choornikkara, Thaikkattukara P.O, Alwaye – 683 106 A. K Mohammed Ali (58 years) Annakkat House, Bank Road, Choornikkara, Thaikkattukara P.O, Alwaye – 683 106 Anto Davis (56 years) Konikkara House, M.A Balakrishnan Road, Kombara, Ernakulam District, Kochi – 682 018 Santo Davis (41 years) Mareena House, Ernakulam North P.O, Kaloor, Ernakulam District, Kochi – 682 018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence despite specific direction to appear.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is absent despite specific direction to appear without any valid reason and is not properly represented. Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases