Case Summary
This case involves the plaintiffs Seema Sunil and Simi Gopinath against the defendants Shobhana A K and Sithara. The suit was about the enforcement of a compromise agreement that was reached between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of Court Fee under Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the compromise agreement lawful and decreed the suit in accordance with that compromise. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court deemed the compromise agreement lawful and satisfactory to all parties.
The court deemed the compromise agreement lawful and satisfactory to all parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court deemed the compromise agreement lawful and satisfactory to all parties.
The court deemed the compromise agreement lawful and satisfactory to all parties.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of agreement is lawful and is signed by all parties to suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence satisfied that the whole of subject mater of suit is satisfied. Hence suit is decreed in accordance with compromise agreement.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Seema Sunil
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Simi Gopinath
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shobhana A K
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sithara
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement, Court Fee receipt.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manoj Kumar M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sibi Karun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in accordance with compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that the whole of subject mater of suit is satisfied. Hence suit is decreed in accordance with compromise agreement.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court Fee under Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court Fee under Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Seema Sunil et al vs Shobhana A K et al regarding compromise agreement.
Case Code Year
Case between Seema Sunil et al vs Shobhana A K et al regarding compromise agreement.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement