Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1003/2023

Case between SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd. vs Subhadra P.T, Deepa M.T et al regarding recovery of money

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd. as the plaintiff company seeking the recovery of a loan amount owed by the defendants. The defendants defaulted on their payment obligations regarding the loan they received.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs.2,29,526 with 9% future interest per annum from the date of the suit until the decree is satisfied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.2,29,526 with 9% future interest per annum and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents provided satisfactory evidence to prove the plaintiff's claims.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.2,29,526 with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 19.10.2023) till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd. (Age not specified years) 1st Floor, Karukapadath Building, Near Changapuzha park metro station, Edapally, Ernakulam

Defendants

Subhadra P.T (43 years years) Puthenpurackal house, Mazhuvanoor P.O, Valamboor, Ernakulam, Pin – 686 669 Deepa M.T (38 years years) Thenoth Nikarth, Kalavankodam P.O, Vayalar, Alappuzha – 688 536 Silpa Ramesh (22 years years) Puthenpurackal house, Irapuram, Ernakulam, Pin – 683 541

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decreeing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.2,29,526/- with 9% future interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.2,29,526/-(Rupees two lakhs twenty nine thousand five hundred and twenty six only) with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit ( ie, from 19.10.2023) till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of Specific Power of Attorney.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement for personal loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of account statement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of legal notice to 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of legal notice to 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of legal notice to 3rd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Registered Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned registered cover issued to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Registered Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned registered cover issued to the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: AD card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original AD Card.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Security Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original security delivery letter executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/19/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases