Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1003/2023

Case between SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd. vs Subhadra P.T, Deepa M.T et al regarding recovery of money

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Closed
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd. as the plaintiff company seeking the recovery of a loan amount owed by the defendants. The defendants defaulted on their payment obligations regarding the loan they received.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs.2,29,526 with 9% future interest per annum from the date of the suit until the decree is satisfied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.2,29,526 with 9% future interest per annum and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs.2,29,526 with 9% future interest per annum from the date of the suit until the decree is satisfied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents provided satisfactory evidence to prove the plaintiff's claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents provided satisfactory evidence to prove the plaintiff's claims.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.2,29,526 with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 19.10.2023) till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhadra P.T
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa M.T
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Silpa Ramesh
Party Age
22
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of Specific Power of Attorney, Original agreement for personal loan, True copy of account statement, True copy of legal notice to 1st defendant, True copy of legal notice to 2nd defendant, True copy of legal notice to 3rd defendant, Returned registered cover issued to the 1st defendant, Returned registered cover issued to the 2nd defendant, Original AD Card, Original promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff company, Original security delivery letter executed by the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rekha K.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.A.Benny
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decreeing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.2,29,526/- with 9% future interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.2,29,526/-(Rupees two lakhs twenty nine thousand five hundred and twenty six only) with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit ( ie, from 19.10.2023) till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of Specific Power of Attorney.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original agreement for personal loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of account statement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of legal notice to 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of legal notice to 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of legal notice to 3rd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Registered Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned registered cover issued to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Registered Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned registered cover issued to the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: AD card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original AD Card.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Security Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original security delivery letter executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd. vs Subhadra P.T, Deepa M.T et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between SECUREPRIME NIDHI Ltd. vs Subhadra P.T, Deepa M.T et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/19/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won