Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 31/2025

Case between SECUREPRIME FINCORP vs Sijo Varghese et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 3 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is a money lending company that claims the defendants failed to repay a loan. The defendants are said to owe a total of ₹386,251 to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling them to recover ₹386,251 from the first defendant along with interest. The second defendant's case was dismissed due to lack of appearance.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The first defendant is directed to pay ₹386,251 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling them to recover ₹386,251 from the first defendant along with interest. The second defendant's case was dismissed due to lack of appearance.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved as against the first defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The first defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,86,251/- (Rupees three lakhs eighty six thousand two hundred and fifty one only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the first defendant or from assets of first defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SECUREPRIME FINCORP
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose K.O
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sijo Varghese
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suma Biju
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Partnership Deed, Agreement for personal loan, Account Statement with Certificate u/s. 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, True Copy of Legal Notice, Postal Receipt, Demand Promissory Note, Security Delivery Letter
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rekha K.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The first defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff an amount due with interest.
Evidence:
The first defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,86,251/- (Rupees three lakhs eighty six thousand two hundred and fifty one only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the first defendant or from assets of first defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the first defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the first defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy was submitted to prove the partnership of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement for personal loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement was provided to establish the loan relationship between the plaintiff and defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Account Statement with Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked subject to proof to further substantiate the claims of repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy used to evidence prior notifications regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another true copy of a legal notice mentioned for the same purpose.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided to demonstrate the sending of legal notices.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to confirm receipt of legal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted to support the claim of loan existence.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Security Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked to affirm the secured nature of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between SECUREPRIME FINCORP vs Sijo Varghese et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between SECUREPRIME FINCORP vs Sijo Varghese et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 09/26/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Maker Village vs M/s. V Robotics Innovations Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bajaj Electricals Limited vs Viswas Marketting Agencies regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won