Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 71/2015

Case between The Secretary vs Surendran et al regarding repayment of debt

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2015-09-03
Duration
0 years, 5 months, 30 days
Case Code No.
71
Case Closed
Thu, 09/03/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Secretary of Thirunnavaya Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. filed a petition seeking repayment of a debt from Surendran, Vijayan, and Kunhippa. The court dismissed the petition for lack of evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition seeking repayment of debt was dismissed by the court due to lack of evidence of the third defendant's means to pay the debt.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed petition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition seeking repayment of debt was dismissed by the court due to lack of evidence of the third defendant's means to pay the debt.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

No batta paid to issue notice to R1 and R2. No evidence adduced to prove that R3 has got means to pay decree debt. hence the petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surendran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunhippa
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
U.Sainudhen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Repayment of debt
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition seeking repayment of debt dismissed due to lack of evidence on the third defendant's means to pay the debt.
Evidence:
No batta paid to issue notice to R1 and R2. No evidence adduced to prove that R3 has got means to pay decree debt. hence the petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 03/04/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 09/03/2015 - 12:00
From
Tue, 09/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Wed, 09/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Musthafa regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Mohan et al regarding loan closure
Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary, Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Mullakkoyamakkanakath Najmudheen et al regarding debt recovery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won