Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 8/2016

Case between The Secretary vs Saravanakumar et al regarding Default Petition

Court
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-09-18
Duration
1 year 8 months 27 days
Case Code No.
8
Case Closed
Mon, 09/18/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A default petition filed by The Secretary against Saravanakumar and Sarath is dismissed by the court due to lack of address provided.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The default petition is dismissed due to the lack of address provided.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Default Petition Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Petition
Final Judgment
No
The default petition is dismissed due to the lack of address provided.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

No address produced. Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saravanakumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P.Asok Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Saravanakumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for 2
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Default petition dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The default petition filed by The Secretary against Saravanakumar and Sarath is dismissed by the court due to lack of address provided.
Evidence:
No address produced. Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 01/12/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/18/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 09/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 09/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Nazeer Chenmala et al regarding default petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur
Default Petition Defendant Won
Case between Secretary vs Vasu regarding Default Petition Dismissal
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Default Petition Defendant Won
Case between The Secretary vs Mohanan Thomas and Joseph Koyappa regarding default petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Default Petition Dismissed
Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Muhammed Haneefa Neduvancheri regarding default petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Default Petition Defendant Won
Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Peranthan Kummarambil regarding default petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Default Petition Defendant Won