Case Summary
The Secretary of Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank filed a summary suit for the recovery of money against Rajan-R1 and Kodakkattil Beena-R2, who did not appear to defend the suit. The court decreed the suit in favor of the Secretary.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Money Recovery
Case Type
Summary Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the Secretary for money recovery.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained uncontroverted and sufficient to prove the case.
Evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained uncontroverted and sufficient to prove the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained uncontroverted and sufficient to prove the case.
Evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained uncontroverted and sufficient to prove the case.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the documents produced in support of the claim, I do not find any reason to disbelieve case of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed Ex-parte
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan-R1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kodakkattil Beena-R2
Plaintiffs Documents
Documents at Exh , Exh and Exh were relied upon to support the case.
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Money Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Decreed in favor of the Secretary for money recovery
Evidence:
Evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained uncontroverted and sufficient to prove the case.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Summary Suit - Money Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Money Recovery
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2014