Case Summary
The Secretary filed a default petition against C.V.Moosakutty and others, seeking a decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Default Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default as no representation was made for the petitioner despite repeated chances.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No batta paid. No representation for the petitioner. Even after giving repeated chances. Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C.V.Moosakutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C.V.Muhammedali
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. Mammi Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Default
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissal for default
Evidence:
No batta paid. No representation for the petitioner. Even after giving repeated chances. Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Default Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016