Case Summary
A case filed by the Decree Holder, a bank, against the Judgment Debtor for default on enquiry, resulting in the dismissal of the Execution Petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed for default
Case Type
Civil Suit - Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The Execution Petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not ready for enquiry despite repeated chances.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent. Even after repeated chances were given the petitioner is not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Secretary perumanna Klari Service Sahakaran Bank No.F.770
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhimarakkar Poozithara
- Party Age
- 65
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jiji.J.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kunhimarakkar Poozithara
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Dismissal
Outcome:
Dismissed for Default
Description:
Dismissal of Execution Petition for default
Evidence:
Petitioner absent. Even after repeated chances were given the petitioner is not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017