Case Summary
The petition was filed for execution of a decree against the respondents who were residing outside the court's jurisdiction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed the execution petition
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed as the respondents were residing outside the court's jurisdiction.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chathappan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o. Kari
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krishnan Mukkoyi
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o. Nadichi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subrhamanian
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o. Kari
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Jiji.J.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Execution of Decree
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking execution of a decree against the defendants
Evidence:
Not mentioned
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank et al vs Chathappan et al regarding non-execution of decree
Case Code Year
Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank et al vs Chathappan et al regarding non-execution of decree