Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
EXECUTION PETITION NO. 86 OF 2016

Case between Secretary of Perumanna Clari Service Co-operative Bank vs Saithalavi et al regarding execution of money decree

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-04-03
Duration
Approximately 4 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Secretary of a Co-operative Bank filed an execution petition seeking to arrest and detain the first respondent in civil prison for non-payment of a money decree. The court dismissed the petition as the first respondent was found not liable to be arrested.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition against the first respondent as the petitioner failed to prove that the first respondent had sufficient means to pay the decree debt and willfully neglected to pay.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition against the first respondent dismissed
Case Type
Civil Execution - Money Decree Enforcement
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The petitioner failed to discharge the burden regarding the first respondent's means to pay the decree debt.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Secretary, Perumanna Clari Service Co-operative Bank (Age not specified years) F.770, Kuttippala Post, Perumanna amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Saithalavi (40 years) Kodiparambil House, perumanna, Perumanna amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Fakkrudheen (37 years) Thommagadan House, Perumanna, Perumanna amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution of Money Decree
Outcome: Not Granted
Description:
Arrest and detention of first respondent for non-payment of money decree
Evidence:
The petitioner failed to prove that the first respondent had sufficient means to pay the decree debt.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of the first respondent's loan application for house repair works.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Election ID Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as proof of the first respondent's identity and age.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 12/26/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases