Case Summary
The Perumanna Clari Service Co-operative Bank filed an execution petition against the judgment debtors for defaulting in payment under order 21 Rule 37, 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Execution petition dismissed for default
Case Type
Application under Code of Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by the bank due to the default of the respondents in submitting the required deposit.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No batta seen deposited even after repeatedly given opportunity for depositing the same. Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Secretary, Perumanna Clari Service Co-operative Bank Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed Rafeeque Naduvath
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o Alavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alavi Naduvath
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o Mohamed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Execution Petition Dismissal
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Execution petition dismissed for default
Evidence:
No batta seen deposited even after repeatedly given opportunity for depositing the same. Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Application under Code of Civil Procedure
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Secretary, Perumanna Clari Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Mohammed Rafeeque Naduvath et al regarding default in payment
Case Code Year
Case between The Secretary, Perumanna Clari Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Mohammed Rafeeque Naduvath et al regarding default in payment