Case Summary
The case involves The Secretary of Chekkiad Service Co Operative Bank and a respondent named Dinesan. The respondent is ready to deposit a sum before the bank and make further payments in installments.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the affidavit filed by the respondent and closed the execution petition temporarily, allowing the petitioner to revive it if payments are defaulted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent agreed to deposit the required amount and made arrangements for further payments.
The respondent agreed to deposit the required amount and made arrangements for further payments.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent agreed to deposit the required amount and made arrangements for further payments.
The respondent agreed to deposit the required amount and made arrangements for further payments.
Supporting Evidence
The affidavit accepted indicates the respondent's willingness to comply with the payment agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
EP is closed for the time being with the liberty to DH to revive EP when JDs makes default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Secretary, Chekkiad Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No F1657
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dinesan
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit filed by the petitioner.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- LETHA P.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Bar Registration
- No F1657
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Secretary, Chekkiad Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No F1657 vs Dinesan regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between The Secretary, Chekkiad Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No F1657 vs Dinesan regarding Execution Petition