Case Summary
The Execution Petition No. 62 of 2016 was filed by the petitioner seeking full satisfaction under Order 21 Rule 38 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court recorded full satisfaction resulting in the closure of the execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Full Satisfaction under Order 21 Rule 38 of CPC
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded full satisfaction in the execution petition, resulting in its closure.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Full Satisfaction is recorded. Hence EP is closed. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 3ʳᵈ day of January, 2017).
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Secretary in charge
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainudheen Poongottil
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o. Saithalavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moideenkutty Kariparambath
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Full Satisfaction under Order 21 Rule 38 of CPC
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioner's request for full satisfaction recorded
Evidence:
Full Satisfaction is recorded. Hence EP is closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Secretary in charge vs Sainudheen Poongottil et al regarding full satisfaction under CPC Order 21 Rule 38
Case Code Year
Case between The Secretary in charge vs Sainudheen Poongottil et al regarding full satisfaction under CPC Order 21 Rule 38